|
|
|
Intergovernmental meetings |
| | Meeting: | Expert Meeting on Methodologies, Classifications, Quantification and Development Impacts of Non-Tariff Barriers | | Date: | 5–7 September 2005 | | Location: | Geneva |
|
| | Programme
| |
| Last update: 02 August 2005 |
| Palais des Nations - Room XXVI |
 |
| |
Morning 10:00 - 13:00 |
Afternoon 15:00 - 18:00 |
 |
| Opening statement: Dr. Supachai
Panitchpakdi, Secretary-General of UNCTAD |
 |
| Items 1 and 2:
Election of officers and adoption of the agenda |
 |
| Introduction of the substantive item 3, |
|
Statements by: Ms. Lakshmi Puri, Director of DITC |
|
Keynote Address: Quantification of NTBs: Overview, Alan Deardorff,
Professor of Economics and Public Policy, University of Michigan |
|
 |
| Item 3: Scope Definition and Classification of NTBs |
| Panelists: |
|
Luis Gonzaga, Director, Information Department, ALADI |
|
Lee Ann Jackson, Economic Affairs Officer, Agriculture Division, WTO |
|
Hiroaki Kuwahara, Chief, Trade Information Section, Trade Analysis Branch, DITC |
|
Ludivine Tamiotti, Legal Affairs Officer, Trade and Environment Division, WTO |
| |
| Possible questions to consider: |
- UNCTAD Coding System of Trade Control Measures (TCMCS), is it still
adequate and serving its purposes? Any suggestions for its expansion and/or
streamlining?
- Are the classifications by others (FAO, WTO, etc.) appropriate and
practical?
- What information concerning NTBs is still missing? What is the possible
bias that missing information could introduce?
|
| Discussion |
 |
|
| Item 3: (Continued) NTB database, structure and development |
| Panelists: |
|
Rafael Cornejo, Inter-American Development Bank |
|
Otto Loesener, Industrial Development Officer, Industrial Promotion & Technology Branch, UNIDO |
|
Hiroaki Kuwahara, Chief, Trade Analysis Branch, DITC |
|
Mondher Mimouni, Market Analyst, ITC, (UNCTAD/WTO) |
|
Kazuaki Miyagishima, Secretary, Codex Alimentarius Commissio, Joint FAO, WHO
Food Standards Programme |
| |
| Possible questions to consider: |
- Which should be the preferable sources and methods for collection of
best and fuller data on NTBs? (Sources from importing countries, exporting
partners, independent sources?)
- What additional information should be stored for an NTB database? At
present, TRAINS include: Product Code (HS), Measure Code (according to TCMCS),
Affected Countries, Footnote (for further description of measure and product
coverage, if necessary), Date of Introduction, Source of Information.
- What indicators of NTBs should be readily available to the database
users (e.g. frequency counts, import coverage)?
- In terms of cooperation and partnerships among relevant international
organizations, who should collect what NTBs? What should be a division of
labour among different organizations, by type of measures or by
country/regions?
|
| Discussion |
| |
18:15
Cocktail offered by the Secretary-General of UNCTAD 1st Floor (E-Building)
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| Item 3: (Continued) Quantification of NTBs - the Current Situation |
| Panelists: |
|
Marc Bachetta, Counsellor, Economic Research and Statistics Division, WTO |
|
David Laborde, Economist, CEPII |
|
Alessandro Nicita, Economist, Development Research Group, The World Bank |
|
Stephen Tokarick, Senior Economist, Research Department, IMF |
| |
| Possible questions to consider: |
- The current most used method for measuring the incidence of NTBs is a
frequency approach. This approach has obvious problems. What could be more
effective approaches that would allow taking account for price, quantity or
elasticity changes to provide an indication of the magnitude of the impact
of a specific NTB on trade?
- What are the possible uses of quantified NTBs? What are the limitations?
|
| Discussion |
 |
|
 |
| Item 3: (Continued) Quantification of NTBs - The Way Forward |
| Panelists: |
|
Alan V. Deardorff, Prof. of Economics and Public Policy, University of Michigan |
|
Marco Fugazza, Associate Economic Officer, TAB, DITC, UNCTAD |
|
Alessandro Nicita, Economist, Development Research Group, The World Bank |
|
Stephen Tokarick, Senior Economist, Research Department, IMF |
| |
| Possible questions to consider: |
- What could make systematic quantification possible? What are the main
obstacles to systematic quantitification?
- What should be most effective forms of cooperation and partnerships
among international organizations in improving NTBs´ quantification methods?
|
| Discussion |
|
 |
 |
| Item 3: (Continued) Current trends in NTBs´ utilization
|
| Panelists: |
| Nancy Adams, Senior Counselor/Chief NAMA Negotiator, U.S. Mission to the WTO |
| Barbara Fliess, Principle Administrator, Trade Directorate, OECD |
| Bernard Hoekman, Groupe d´Economie Mondiale, Institut d´Etudes Politiques,
Development Research Group, The World Bank |
| Roy Santana, Economic Affairs Officer, Market Access Division, WTO |
| |
| Possible questions to consider: |
- What are the trends in the relative importance of the various NTBs?
- What are today the main NTBs facing exporters of developing
countries, including LDCs?
- In the last ten years, there it has been estimated a seven fold
increase in government mandated testing and certification requirements
What are in this context the main ways to enable developing countries to
be involved meaningfully in the international standard setting so they
can participate more fully in world trade?
|
|
 |
| Item 3: (Continued) Concerns of
developing countries |
| Panelists: |
| Soulaymane Coulibaly, Economics and International Relations, Nestle SA
(Representative, International Chamber of Commerce) |
|
Samuel Laird, Inter-Regional Advisor, UNCTAD |
|
Herson Rodriguez, General Director, Informatics, SIECA |
|
Subash C. Sharma, Economic, Trade and Transport Division, SAARC |
| |
| Possible questions to consider: |
- What should be a balanced approach toward disciplining arbitrariness
and discretion in the use of NTBs, especially against developing country
exporters?
- Is it realistic to pursue the approach of negotiating and adopting
Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) between developed and developing
countries?
|
| Adoption of the outcome of the discussions |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |


|
|