STATEMENT BY THE LEADER OF MYANMAR DELEGATION

H.E. U SOE THA, MINISTER FOR NATIONAL PLANNING AND

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

AT THE III UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES

BRUSSELS, 14-20 MAY 2001

 

 

(Check Against Delivery)

Mr. President,

Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

            On behalf of the Delegation of Myanmar, allow me, at the outset, to congratulate you upon your election as president of the Conference. We are fully confident that your able leadership will guide this Conference towards achieving its objectives. Allow me also to congratulate other members of the Bureau upon their well-deserved election. At the same time, I wish to express our sincere gratitude to EU and the Government of Belgium for hosting this Conference and for their generous hospitality to all of us.

 

Mr. President,

 

            The previous two Programmes of Action adopted for the LDCs were to achieve sustainable economic growth and development during the 1980s and 1990s. But a comprehensive evaluation of the precarious socio-economic conditions in the LDCs confirm that the imple-mentation of the  previous  programmes  of action is  unsatisfactory.

            The international community has been far less supportive of LDCs in many areas foreseen in the programme of action. Unsustainable external debt, paucity of development finances, low levels of technological, institutional and human capacities, lack of export diversification and market access and vulnerability to natural and man made disasters are among the factors severely affecting the growth and development prospects of the LDCs. The aim of the draft programme of action for the LDCs for the decade 2001-2010 is to significantly improve the human conditions of more than 600 million people in LDCs during the present decade.

 

Mr. President,

 

            I would like to briefly review the overall economic performance in Myanmar over the past decade.  Myanmar is located in Asia region. Its total land area is 676,578 sq-km and the total population is 51 million. It shares borders with Bangladesh and India on the northwest, the People's Republic of China on the northeast,the Lao people's Democratic Republic on the east and Thailand on the southeast.

 

Since inception of market oriented economic system in 1988, the government has laid down various development plans to gain progress. During the period from 1989 to 1991, stabilization programmes were formulated to revitalize the economy and Myanmar's economy was managed by formulating and implementing annual plans. Due to concerted efforts and extensive participation of the private sector, Myanmar's economy began to restore. Hence, during the three years period from 1989 to 1991, GDP rose at the growth rate of 5.9 percent and GDP per capita consequently increased. To place emphasis on the economic development of the country, Four Year Short-Term Plan (1992 to 1995) was formulated and an average annual growth rate of 7.5 percent was attained  during that period. The recent five year plan was started from 1996 and completed in 2000. The growth rates were 6.4%, 5.7%, 5.8%, 10.9% and 13.6% from the year 1996 to 2000 respectively. The average annual growth rate of 8.4% was achieved during the recent completed five year plan.

 

            It is expected that Myanmar could be able to maintain high GDP growth rate this year but the rate might be somewhat lower than the previous year.

Mr. President,  

 

            The government is endeavouring for the sustainable economic growth of the country and the fruits of economic development to be equally enjoyed by the entire people. While raising the standards of living and quality of life of the people, new economic opportunities are being created by adopting wide-ranging economic reform measures which include among others, decentralizing central control, legalizing of border trade, liberalization of trade policies, allowing foreign investment, encouraging and promoting private sector development, initiating new financial management system and streamlining taxes and duties in the context of proper evolution of the market-oriented economic system. Furthermore, improvement in banking sector to become more responsive to private sector needs was also made. All these reform measures have gained momentum as evidenced by significant growth rate of 13.6 percent in 2000 as well as downward trend in inflation and also improvement in volume of trade.

            The inflation declined during the last five year plan. It was 20% in 1996, reduced down to –1.6% in 2000 and the rate is expected to be less than 3% in 2001. As regards exports and imports, exports increased at an average annual growth rate of 13.1 percent during the last five years. During that period, imports increased at the yearly average growth rate of 5.2 percent. Total volume of foreign trade increased at the average rate of 7.6% during the last five years.

 

            Myanmar is inviting and welcoming FDI. However, FDI   reduced drastically in 1998 and 1999. The external factors  have played the major role in the decline of FDI. With the onset of financial crisis in Asia in 1997, coinciding with tightening of certain restrictions upon Myanmar, there was a perceptible slowdown in foreign capital inflow . But FDI started to pick up last year. A total of $ 7.2 billion of FDI has been approved on a cumulative basis since 1989.

 

Mr. President,

 

            In view of the topography and natural resources, Myanmar strives for the development of the economy based on the agriculture sector. Being an agrarian country, Myanmar has food surpluses. Not only promotion of agricultural productivity but also the needs for development of fishery industry and marine resources business are being attended to. Forests of Myanmar are well conserved and policies designed for sustainable development and prevention of environmental degradation have been laid down. As plans to increase the production of food are being formulated and implemented, it is firmly believed that not only will Myanmar have domestic food sufficiency, it will also be able to fulfill regional requirements for food to a certain degree.

            Myanmar has been striving for the development of infrastructure with concerted efforts using its own resources. Roads, bridges and dams are being built in all the regions of the country. One of the main aims of the current Five-Year Plan commencing from 2001 to 2005 is to develop the power and energy sectors. In Myanmar, electricity supply system is based on hydropower and gas turbine stations. The average annual growth rate in electricity generation over the past ten years has been 11.4 percent, and sales have grown at the same rate. To promote the capacity utilization of electric power, Myanmar plans to commission 4 gas turbine projects and 8 hydropower plan projects during the current  Five-Year Plan commencing from the year 2001. The government, with the participation of private sector, plans to invest more in the infrastructure development endeavours.

 

Mr. President,

 

              Myanmar’s social infrastructure development is very promising. The National Education Quality Improvement Special Four Year Plan covering 2000 to 2003, is currently in progress with the vision to create an education system that is on par with that of international standard and that can generate a learning society capable of facing the challenges of the Knowledge Age. The literacy rate is 91 percent and hopes to reach 97% in 2010 but continued efforts will be made for the remaining illiterates to become literates in the 21st century. Enrolment rate in primary education is estimated at 96 percent and completion rate of primary education is 80 percent by 2010. At present, it is 91 percent and 52 percent respectively. Infant mortality, at birth, per thousand live birth was 55.0 for urban areas and 62.5 for rural areas in 1999. To enable every citizen to attain full life expectancy and enjoy longevity of life is the main objective of the National Health Administration.

 

              At the time when Myanmar is making every effort for the development of the social and economic conditions of its people, she does not receive normal assistance and full co-operation from some international institutions as it should be, in spite of being a family member. Nevertheless, Myanmar is working hard for socio-economic development of her people by relying upon her own resources. At present Myanmar is experiencing restrictions being imposed in a number of areas. Myanmar has not been able to mobilize official grants and loans from bilateral and multilateral agencies, normal for a country at its stage of development. Should there be no restrictions being imposed on Myanmar, we believe that Myanmar will be able to  graduate from LDC list within this decade.

 

Mr. President,

 

Myanmar, as an LDC since 1989, has been endeavoring for the all-round development of the country, devoting huge amount of its own limited resources. These endeavors have resulted in considerable and tangible achievements that “include, among others, peace and stability of the state, accelerated growth of the economy and alleviation of poverty through socio-economic development of the country especially in the remote and border areas.

            The programme of action for the LDCs for the 1990s embodied a commitment to arrest and reverse the decline in the socio-economic condition of the LDCs but the 1995 High-Level Intergovernmental Meeting on the Mid-term Global Review on the Implementation of the Programme of Action and subsequent reviews by the Trade and Development Board clearly showed that the commitments contained in the Programme of Action have not been fully implemented. The present Third United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries will create a framework for partnership based on mutual Commitments by LDCs and development partners to undertake concrete actions for improving socio-economic conditions and poverty alleviation of LDCs without any discriminations.

 

Mr. President,

 

            Debt Problems are a serious obstacle to the pursuit of economic and social development of the LDCs. According to the LDC 2000 report, two thirds of the LDCs have an external debt burden that is unsustainable according to international criteria. About 75% of Myanmar’s concessional debt is owed to bilateral creditors, primarily Japan and to a much lesser extent Germany and the remainder is owed to multilateral institutions. Germany made a write-off for the debts for 1985-87. France cancelled its loans to the amount of French Francs 497 million. The government of Japan is extending debt relief grants to Myanmar and the total grant amounted to Japanese Yen 65.9 billion as of March 2000.As regards loans for multilateral institutions, IBRD/IDA and ADB have suspended their lending operations since 1988. In Myanmar, external medium and long-term public debt was US $5.1 billion in 1998 and US $ 5.4 billion (p.a) in 1999. Myanmar would welcome the initiatives for debt relief and debt cancellation and expects to benefit fully from the initiatives. An immediate action in support of development efforts of the LDCs is to alleviate heavy debt burden which is a major impediment to economic recovery of the LDCs. Outright cancellation of outstanding ODA loans to the LDCs is highly desirable.

 

            In the LDC context, more aid is a precondition for effective aid, and effective aid is necessary for economic growth, poverty reduction and sustainable development. ODA flows continue to be of critical importance in sustaining growth and development in LDCs. The volume of ODA should be progressively brought into in line with the UN target of 0.2 percent of industralized countries' GDP  for the LDCs. ODA flows currently represent less than 0.2 percent of the total GDP of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) countries, far short of UN target.

 

            In real capita terms, net ODA to LDCs has dropped by 45% since 1990 and is now back to the levels of the early 1970s. The decline in level of ODA is therefore a matter of a serious concern. ODA to Myanmar was very limited in the past decade. The  Government of the Republic of Korea provided US $ 59.8 million and OPEC Fund provided US $ 35.8 million to Myanmar during the last 10 years. UNDP also does not have a Country Programme in  Myanmar but instead it has been carrying out a Programme of Human Development Initiatives involving humanitarian projects at the grass root level. The amount of ODA assistance in Myanmar were US$ 56.2 million, 45.2 million, 48.9 million, 51.1 million and 76.3 million from the year 1996 to 2000 respectively. The ODA levels provided to Myanmar are low, much lower than those provided to other economies in transition in the region. For example in 1997, ODA per capita provided to 3 neighbouring countries of Myanmar were about US$ 14 to 82 while in Myanmar it was only $1.0. Myanmar welcomes substantial external resource flows for the sustainable development  of its socio-economic condition.

 

Mr. President,

For further economic development of Myanmar, another  five year plan will be implemented from the year 2001 to 2005 with a view to achieving high growth rate. The main aims of the economic plan are : to extend setting up of agro-based industries and other required industries in building an industrial nation as the first stage; to develop the power and energy sectors to be in conformity with the developing trend of industries; to extend the agriculture, livestock and fishery sectors in order to meet the local demand and to export the surplus; to set up forest areas and to green the arid districts, to extend the health and education sectors’ development and progress of human resources; to develop the rural areas; and to ensure all-round development in  other sectors.

           

            Poverty alleviation and rural development are the priorities as well as important tasks of the government. 71% of the total population of Myanmar live in the rural areas and thus the task of the development of those areas is a challenge for the government and our primary concern. Integrated rural development plan has been laid down for 2001 to 2005 with a view to raise the socio-economic conditions of the rural populace, focusing on:-

1.      construction of roads between villages in rural areas and to link with urban areas;

2.      making water available for people as well as for cultivation;

3.      uplifting the education standard, improving the quality of teachers, enabling school age children to attend class, making sure children learned well and literate in the schools;

4.      uplifting of rural health care system , and

5.      bringing about the economic growth of the rural populace.

 

            In our endeavors for the economic and human resource development of the country, the bilateral and multilateral technical and economic cooperation will be much beneficial to raise technology and productivity which will undoubtedly alleviate the poverty condition. Should we have normal cooperation from international communities our economic development will be much faster, the living standards of the people will be higher and poverty will be alleviated earlier.

 

Myanmar is launching regional and international cooperation with full confidence. As the nation values her sovereignty she also respects the sovereignty of all nations. Myanmar will be a friendly country with all other countries and international organizations of the world and will continue to work towards better understanding and cooperation. 

 

Mr. President,

            I would like to stress what already was stated in the Least Developed Countries 2000 Report, i.e. the LDCs need a "New Deal" in international development cooperation and we support the five key elements suggested by UNCTAD.

           

            We notice that Myanmar's endeavours are in line with the Commitments contained in the draft Programme of Action for the decade. We strongly support the draft Programme of Action.

                       

            In conclusion, May I express our sincere wish for the successful formulation and adoption by the conference of an effective programme of action for making substantial progress toward halving the proportion of people living in extreme poverty and suffering from hunger by 2015 and  promoting the sustainable development of the LDCs  in this decade.

            Thank you.

 

*******