Procedural Issue Substantive Issue
| Year the case was initiated | 2000 |
| Year the award was rendered | 2007 |
| Country involved | Canada |
| Home country of the investor | United States |
| Parties to the dispute | United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Canada |
| Sector | 3 |
| Type of investment | postal services |
| Nature of dispute / claim | claims arising from allegedly anti-competitive practices of Canada and Canada Post Corporation in the non-monopoly postal services market |
| Legal instrument | NAFTA |
| Rules / Venues | UNCITRAL |
| Amount sought by investor | not less than US$ 160 million |
| Amount awarded / status of dispute | Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over certain claims but has jurisdiction over others;
Tribunal rejects remaining claim on the merits |
| Arbitrators | Kenneth Keith (Chair); Dean Ronald Cass; L. Yves Fortier
|
| Decisions rendered | Decision on Amici Curiae issued on 17 October 2001;
Award on Jurisdiction issued on 22 November 2002; Award and Dissenting Opinion issued on 24 May 2007; |
| Status | awarded in favor of the state |
| Links | http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/UPS-Jurisdiction.pdf http://www.investmentclaims.com/decisions/UPSMeritsAward24May2007.pdf |
| Commentary (if any) | |
| Special features |